Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Congress Bans Protests at Military Funerals

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Congress Bans Protests at Military Funerals


    Protests such as this one, at a soldier's funeral in Marblehead, Mass., prompted Congress to act.

    Demonstrators would be barred from disrupting military funerals at national cemeteries under legislation approved by Congress and sent to the White House Wednesday.

    The measure, passed by voice vote in the House hours after the Senate passed an amended version, specifically targets a Kansas church group that has staged protests at military funerals around the country, claiming that the deaths were a sign of God's anger at U.S. tolerance of homosexuals.

    The act "will protect the sanctity of all 122 of our national cemeteries as shrines to their gallant dead," Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said prior to the Senate vote.

    "It's a sad but necessary measure to protect what should be recognized by all reasonable people as a solemn, private and deeply sacred occasion," he said.


    Rev. Fred Phelps and his followers say the deaths of U.S. soldiers in Iraq are a sign that God is punishing America for its tolerance of homosexuality.

    Under the Senate bill, approved without objection by the House with no recorded vote, the "Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act" would bar protests within 300 feet of the entrance of a cemetery and within 150 feet of a road into the cemetery from 60 minutes before to 60 minutes after a funeral. Those violating the act would face up to a $100,000 fine and up to a year in prison.

    The sponsor of the House bill, Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., said he took up the issue after attending a military funeral in his home state, where mourners were greeted by "chants and taunting and some of the most vile things I have ever heard."

    "Families deserve the time to bury their American heroes with dignity and in peace," Rogers said Wednesday before the Hosue vote.

    The demonstrators are led by the Rev. Fred Phelps of Topeka, Kan., who has previously organized protests against those who died of AIDS and gay murder victim Matthew Shepard.

    In an interview when the House bill passed, Phelps said Congress was "blatantly violating the First Amendment" rights to free speech in passing the bill. He said that if the bill becomes law he will continue to demonstrate but would abide by the restrictions.

    Sen. Pat Roberts, a Republican from Kansas, said the loved ones of those who die have already sacrificed for the nation and "we must allow them the right to mourn without being thrust into a political circus."

    In response to the demonstrations, the Patriot Guard Riders, a motorcyle group including many veterans, has begun appearing at military funerals to pay respects to the fallen service member and protect the family from disruptions.

    More than a dozen states are considering similar laws to restrict protests at nonfederal cemeteries. The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit against a new Kentucky law, saying it goes too far in limiting freedom of speech and expression.

    Source: AP
    0
    a:2:{i:170;a:5:{s:12:"polloptionid";i:170;s:6:"nodeid";s:5:"32326";s:5:"title";s:3:"Yes";s:5:"votes";i:0;s:6:"voters";a:0:{}}i:171;a:5:{s:12:"polloptionid";i:171;s:6:"nodeid";s:5:"32326";s:5:"title";s:2:"No";s:5:"votes";i:2;s:6:"voters";a:2:{i:0;s:4:"1017";i:1;s:3:"874";}}}
    0%
    0

    The poll is expired.


  • #2
    I can think of a lot of military funerals in history that should've drawn some protests! Freedom is not about what is 'nice and pleasant'. Freedom is often the right to be able to scream out the unpopular and the unpleasant. The fact that the Bush Administration began this escapade by whisking in and hiding the US dead out of Iraq and by down playing the number of deaths(the US doesn't count the deaths of soldiers who died in transport out of Iraq or from wounds received in Iraq if transferred to a hospital out of Iraq)shows clearly that the right to protest at a military funeral - is not simply a matter of decorum. It is the right for the Govt. to hide reality , and it is the denial of your right to effectively protest. It is no different than the various laws and ordinances that the various state and local govts. tried to use in the USA to denie protesters the right to gather at lunch counters or other specific areas in the 1960's. Those laws and ordinances themselves were often descendent of laws designed to stop Unions ie. to keep strikers from gathering in specific locations. Well, the US Govt. has spoken - and if you love FREEDOM you are now practically an OUTLAW in the eyes of America. The USA is no longer - if it ever was - a Free World Nation. The USA can send a jarhead military recruiter into a slum...but the USA won't allow you to protest at the resultant funeral ? Keep quiet. Do as Big Brother commands. Don't make waves. This is America.

    Comment


    • #3
      What Congress did is Constitutional.

      Comment


      • #4
        People should have the right to peaceful protest about anything. Death in war should be protested when the truth of the war proves unjust. This is just one small nip off the constutional rights of Americans. But then you're looking at a government that won't enforce the immigration laws and has to reinvent them to cater to the globalists, big business,and the President of Mexico.

        Comment

        Unconfigured Ad Widget

        Collapse
        Working...
        X