Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

USC football gets 2-year bowl ban

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • USC football gets 2-year bowl ban

    The USC football program will receive a two-year postseason ban, a reduction in scholarships and a forfeiture of wins from at least the 2004 season when the NCAA releases its sanctions on Thursday.

    The Los Angeles Times reported the NCAA sanctions include the loss of more than 20 scholarships.

    ESPN The Magazine's Bruce Feldman confirmed the two-year postseason ban and a reduction in scholarships from a second USC source.

    USC will respond Thursday to the NCAA's findings following its investigation into possible violations by the Trojans' football and men's basketball programs, a source with direct knowledge of the situation told ESPN's Joe Schad.

    There is no news conference scheduled for Thursday. According to an SID at USC, the school would issue a statement in response to any NCAA announcement addressing penalties. A different source had said earlier in the day that the school would have a news conference following the NCAA announcement.

    The NCAA infractions committee held a hearing in February in which USC presented its responses to allegations of NCAA violations. Results of the report have been expected for several weeks.

    USC football players will be informed about the sanctions at a mandatory meeting Thursday morning, a source told Feldman.

    Once released, USC would have a chance to appeal.

    USC already admitted wrongdoing with the basketball program and sanctioned itself, including a ban on postseason participation, a reduction of scholarships and vacating all of its wins from 2007-08.

    The school's football team is under investigation for its dealing with Heisman Trophy-winning running back Reggie Bush, who played at the school from 2003 to '05. If Bush is found retroactively ineligible, the Heisman Trust could strip him of his 2005 award.

    The NCAA and investigators from the Pac-10 Conference have tried to determine whether Bush and his parents took improper benefits, including an alleged rent-free residence provided by a sports marketer. Bush has not met with NCAA and Pac-10 investigators and has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing.

    USC chose to contest the allegation against the football program, hoping to overcome the perception of a lack of institutional control, which could result in significant sanctions, including scholarship reductions, TV and postseason bans, recruiting restrictions and probation.

    If USC is found guilty of major violations, the NCAA also could rule that the Trojans are "repeat violators." Per NCAA rules, "An institution shall be considered a 'repeat' violator if the Committee on Infractions finds that a major violation has occurred within five years of the starting date of a major penalty."

    The athletic program was last sanctioned in August of 2001.

    Source: AP

  • #2
    I thought USC hiring Lane Kiffin was a post season ban in itself.

    Comment


    • #3
      Lane Kiffin just found out that karma's dick is HARD....and FIERCE!!!!

      Comment


      • #4
        How many times are we going to see a John Calipari, Pete Carroll, Kelvin Sampson, etc cheat, then walk away and suffer no real punishment, while the athletes they leave behind have to suffer the consequences. And of course because the NCAA is so strict, current USC players can't transfer to another school in order to avoid the punishment caused by Carroll without having to sit out a year.

        Cheating will go on and on in college until the high-profile coaches are made responsible, even after they leave. Carroll I am sure will cry that he had no idea - and maybe he didn't. But he also had incentive not to want to know. Being dumb is an excuse to the NCAA. It needs to stop being an excuse.

        Comment

        Unconfigured Ad Widget

        Collapse
        Working...
        X